Skip to content
Fort Lauderdale, FL · Licensed across FloridaMon–Fri 10:00 AM – 6:00 PM · (954) 807-3208
Romco Impact — NaplesCall

What we install · Glazing Into Existing Frames

Where the Frames Are Sound, Only the Glass Has to Change

Where existing frames are sound and an approval exists for glazing into them, changing only the glass is cheaper, faster and far less disruptive. On this coast it suits the condominium stock particularly well.

Tell us the address and whether the property has been repaired since 2022. That second answer decides whether this is a window job or something larger.

50%

The threshold that turns a repair into a compliance project

Wind

Impact glass is a wind product. We will not sell it as flood protection

Our crews

We measure, we schedule, and our own people install

Licensed

A licensed Florida general contractor

The cheaper answer that costs a survey to find

Retrofit does not suit every building, and the honest reason it goes unmentioned is partly that it is the smaller sale. There is a second reason too: assessing it properly means opening up and examining fixings and substrate, which takes real time on a survey. Quoting a full replacement is quicker than finding out whether a cheaper answer was available, and nobody is ever going to complain about a job that was done more thoroughly than it needed to be.

What decides it on a building here

  • Whether the frames are square, sound and properly anchored.
  • Whether an approval exists for that glazing in that frame system.
  • Whether the frame will take the thickness and weight of laminated glass.
  • Whether the drainage path still runs or was sealed in a past repair.
  • Whether the building took water, and how high it reached.

Why it fits the condominium stock here

Naples, Marco Island, Bonita and Fort Myers carry a large stock of low and mid-rise condominium buildings, many built with aluminum frame systems that remain structurally sound even though the glazing in them is original and unrated.

Retrofit has a second advantage on those buildings that has nothing to do with money. Almost nothing visible changes, which makes it a far easier proposition to put to an association that has already declined a full replacement on appearance grounds.

How we handle it

  1. 01Open up and assess honestly before offering this at all.
  2. 02Confirm an approval covers this specific retrofit.
  3. 03Reglaze, reseal, and prove the drainage still works afterwards.
  4. 04Give a per-elevation answer where the building does not behave as one.

On a multi-unit building the mixed answer is the usual one, and it is perfectly workable — retrofit the elevations where the frames are good and replace where they are not. Applying a single approach uniformly to a building that is not uniform wastes money at one end and cuts corners at the other.

Said plainly

Where we stop

This is not a route around bad frames. Where frames are corroded, distorted or poorly anchored, retrofit stops being the cheaper option and becomes the wrong one, and we will not offer it dressed up as a saving.

FAQ

Common questions

Is retrofit a lower standard?
No, where the approval applies and the frames are genuinely sound. It is a narrower scope, not a weaker result. Where the frames are not sound it is not a compromise either — it is simply the wrong answer.
Our building flooded. Does that rule it out?
Not by itself, and it does mean the survey has to establish what the water reached and what it left behind. Ground-floor units and upper floors in the same building frequently get different answers.
Will the association find this easier to approve?
Very often, because the exterior barely changes. Where a board has already turned down a full replacement on appearance, this is worth putting to them as a genuinely different proposal.

Next step

Find out what is actually wrong with it.

An inspection, photographs of what we found, and a written scope. If the honest answer is that it can wait another season, that is the answer you will get.